Ontario speed cameras repealed, three stay
In force 14 November 2025
Part XIV.1 is gone from the Highway Traffic Act. Ontario speed cameras are repealed, and the three other camera Parts are still in the statute and still issuing tickets.
A red light camera ticket is charged against the registered owner rather than whoever was driving, and the Highway Traffic Act is drafted with unusual care to make that possible.
About this work
The Act does not answer that in one line, and it is worth being precise rather than reassuring. What section 205.24 removes for an owner convicted as owner is the licence suspension for fine default and any imprisonment or probation order. It says nothing about demerit points either way.
What the regulation says is that points are recorded in respect of the person convicted, and that subsection 144 (18) carries three of them. Where the driver is the one convicted, those three follow. Where the conviction is of the owner as owner, no driver has been identified in the proceeding at all. Anyone who wants certainty about their own record should order a driver's abstract rather than rely on a general answer, including this one.
How the charge works
Section 207 (1) lets the owner of a vehicle be charged with an offence the driver could be charged with. Subsection (2) then lists the provisions where that cannot be done, and the drafting of that list is the whole mechanism.
Section 207 (2) bars an owner conviction for subsections 144 (1) to (17) and 144 (19) to (32). Subsection 144 (18), failing to stop at a red light, is left out of both ranges. That gap is deliberate and it is what a camera ticket runs on.
Section 205.17 (1) prohibits a summons under clause 3 (2) (b) of the Provincial Offences Act in a red light camera proceeding. The offence notice is served under the regulations instead.
Section 205.24 (1) (a) says an owner convicted as owner is not liable to a driver's licence suspension under section 46 for defaulting on the fine. That is a consequence an ordinary unpaid ticket does carry.
Section 205.24 (1) (b) and (2) remove imprisonment and probation orders under subsection 72 (1) of the Provincial Offences Act, for an owner and for a driver alike.
The route
4 stages, each with its own clock
The camera scheme is a separate part of the Act with its own evidence and service rules. These are the ones that change how a ticket is answered.
Sections 205.17 to 205.24 apply where the proceeding is commenced by filing a certificate of offence under Part I of the Provincial Offences Act on red light camera evidence.
An offence notice in a camera proceeding may be served in accordance with the regulations, and subsections 3 (3) to (7) of the Provincial Offences Act do not apply to it.
Where the officer who issued the certificate of offence also served the notice, the officer certifies that on the certificate, and that certificate is received in evidence as proof of service.
Item 8 of the table to O. Reg. 339/94 assigns three demerit points to subsection 144 (18) among the failing to obey a signal light offences. Points attach to the person convicted.
Before the meeting
5 things to bring
Bring what you have and say what is missing. A meeting with the papers in front of it settles in one sitting what two telephone calls will not.
Our approach
The same four steps on every matter, whether it is a refusal at the Federal Court or a ticket at the Provincial Offences court.
Book a consultationWe take the full history and read the documents before offering an opinion. Most bad advice comes from acting on half the facts.
You get a candid read on strength, timeline and cost, including when the honest answer is that you do not need to hire anyone.
We prepare the application, the defence or the appeal properly the first time, because fixing a weak record later is harder and dearer.
You hear from us at each stage, and you hear what a wait actually means rather than a date chosen to sound better.
Reported decisions
7 allowed of 22 reported since 2023
Public judgments of the Federal Court with Kapil Rathod as counsel of record, each checkable by citation on the court's own site. The rest were dismissed and are listed with these ones.
Super visa, parents and grandparents
2026 FC 99Docket IMM-23381-24
Application allowedWork permit, Temporary Foreign Worker Program
2026 FC 105Docket IMM-18690-24
Application allowedTemporary resident visa
2026 FC 805Docket IMM-20802-24
Application allowedPermanent residence, Express Entry
2025 FC 275Docket IMM-1797-24
Application allowedWork permit, job offer
2024 FC 1928Docket IMM-6445-23
Application allowedStudy permit
2024 FC 1487Docket IMM-3700-23
Application allowedTemporary resident visa
2024 FC 1453Docket IMM-10337-23
Application allowedUpdates
1 note
Dated notes on the rule changes that reach this work. Each records what moved and when it took effect; this page carries the position now.
In force 14 November 2025
Part XIV.1 is gone from the Highway Traffic Act. Ontario speed cameras are repealed, and the three other camera Parts are still in the statute and still issuing tickets.
A red light camera ticket in Ontario is charged to the registered owner under section 207, using a gap deliberately left in subsection 207 (2) for subsection 144 (18), and section 205.24 removes the licence suspension for fine default along with imprisonment and probation.
What it does not do is answer the demerit point question in terms, which is why an abstract beats an assumption.
Common questions
7 answered here
Written to be read once and acted on rather than to be rung about. Each answer is complete where the law allows a complete answer.
Because a camera photographs a plate. The scheme could not work on driver liability, so the Act was amended to allow owner liability for this one subsection while leaving the rest of section 144 alone.
The practical consequence is that the person who receives the notice may not have been in the car. Section 207 (1) has one exception on its face: it does not apply where the vehicle was in the possession of someone other than the owner without the owner's consent.
Whether the certificate of offence and the offence notice were properly issued and served, because the camera scheme has its own service rule and its own certificate evidence provisions in sections 205.17 to 205.21.
Whether the vehicle in the photographs is the vehicle on the permit, and whether the plate reading is right. Evidence of ownership and what the photographs must show are both governed by regulation under section 205.25.
The registered owner. Section 207 (1) allows an owner to be charged with an offence the driver could be charged with, and section 207 (2) leaves subsection 144 (18) out of the list of provisions where that is barred, which is what makes a camera ticket possible.
Not under section 46 as a result of that conviction. Section 205.24 (1) (a) says an owner convicted as owner is not liable to that suspension for defaulting on the fine, which is a consequence an ordinary unpaid ticket does carry.
No. Section 205.24 removes imprisonment and any probation order under subsection 72 (1) of the Provincial Offences Act, both for an owner convicted as owner and for a driver convicted as driver on camera evidence.
Section 207 (1) makes the owner liable unless, at the time of the offence, the vehicle was in the possession of some person other than the owner without the owner's consent. Lending the car to somebody willingly does not meet that, which is the point of an owner liability scheme.
No. Section 205.17 (1) prohibits a summons under clause 3 (2) (b) of the Provincial Offences Act in a proceeding based on red light camera evidence.
Bring the offence notice and the vehicle permit. A red light camera ticket runs on a different part of the Act from an ordinary ticket, and the response date is short.